Jorge Lorenzo tercepat pada 2nd session MotoGP Test ...!!!

Reblogged from Rudi Triatmono Personal Blogs:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Well,... pada gelaran MotoGP Test di Sepang baru-baru ini... memang terjadi persaingan yang cukup seru antar Spaniard riderz... yaitu Dani Pedrosa dengan Jorge Lorenzo ...!!! Jika di 1st session Dani Pedrosa (Honda) mencatat waktu tercepat yaitu 2'01.580 detik... maka pada 2nd session,... Jorge Lorenzo (Yamaha) membalas dengan waktu tercepat yaitu 2'00.282 detik ...!!! Top 5 waktu tercepat memang didominasi antara Yamaha dan Honda ...

Read more… 122 more words

Inspirational of The Apple Tree

 

Suatu masa dahulu, terdapat sebatang pohon apel yang amat besar. Seorang kanak-kanak lelaki begitu gemar bermain-main di sekitar pohon apel ini setiap hari.Dia memanjat pohon tersebut, memetik serta memakan apel sepuas-puas hatinya, dan adakalanya dia beristirahat lalu terlelap di perdu pohon apel tersebut. Anak lelaki tersebut begitu menyayangi tempat permainannya. Pohon apel itu juga menyukai anaktersebut.

Masa berlalu… anak lelaki itu sudah besar danmenjadi seorang remaja. Dia tidak lagi menghabiskanmasanya setiap hari bermain di sekitar pohon apel tersebut. Namun begitu, suatu hari dia datang kepadapohon apel tersebut dengan wajah yang sedih. “Marilah bermain-mainlah di sekitarku,” ajak pohonapel itu.” Aku bukan lagi kanak-kanak, aku tidak lagi gemarbermain dengan engkau,” jawab remaja itu.” Aku mahukan permainan. Aku perlukan wang untukmembelinya,” tambah remaja itu dengan nada yang sedih.Lalu pohon apel itu berkata, “

Kalau begitu, petiklahapel-apel yang ada padaku. Juallah untuk mendapatkanuang. Dengan itu, kau dapat membeli permainan yang kau inginkan.”
Remaja itu dengan gembiranya memetik semua apel dipohon itu dan pergi dari situ. Dia tidak kembali lagiselepas itu. Pohon apel itu merasa sedih. Masa berlalu…Suatu hari, remaja itu kembali. Dia semakin dewasa.
Pohon apel itu merasa gembira.”Marilah bermain-mainlah di sekitarku,” ajak pohonapel itu.”Aku tiada waktu untuk bermain. Aku terpaksa bekerjauntuk mendapatkan uang. Aku ingin membina rumahsebagai tempat perlindungan untuk keluargaku. Bolehkahkau menolongku?” Tanya anak itu.”

Maafkan aku. Aku tidak mempunyai rumah. Tetapi kauboleh memotong dahan-dahanku yang besar ini dan kaubuatlah rumah daripadanya.” Pohon apel itu memberikancadangan.Lalu, remaja yang semakin dewasa itu memotong kesemuadahan pohon apel itu dan pergi dengan gembiranya. Pohon apel itu pun turut gembira tetapi kemudiannyamerasa sedih karena remaja itu tidak kembali lagiselepas itu.

Suatu hari yang panas, seorang lelaki datang menemuipohon apel itu. Dia sebenarnya adalah anak lelaki yangpernah bermain-main dengan pohon apel itu. Dia telahmatang dan dewasa.”Marilah bermain-mainlah di sekitarku,” ajak pohonapel itu.” Maafkan aku, tetapi aku bukan lagi anak lelaki yangsuka bermain-main di sekitarmu. Aku sudah dewasa. Akumempunyai cita-cita untuk belayar. Malangnya, akutidak mempunyai boat. Bolehkah kau menolongku?” tanyalelaki itu.”

Aku tidak mempunyai boat untuk diberikan kepada kau. Tetapi kau boleh memotong batang pohon ini untukdijadikan boat. Kau akan dapat belayar dengangembira,” kata pohon apel itu.Lelaki itu merasa amat gembira dan menebang batangpohon apel itu. Dia kemudiannya pergi dari situ dengangembiranya dan tidak kembali lagi selepas itu. Namunbegitu, pada suatu hari, seorang lelaki yang semakindimamah usia, datang menuju pohon apel itu. Dia adalahanak lelaki yang pernah bermain di sekitar pohon apelitu.”Gambar

Maafkan aku. Aku tidak ada apa-apa lagi untukdiberikan kepada kau. Aku sudah memberikan buahkuuntuk kau jual, dahanku untuk kau buat rumah, batangkuuntuk kau buat boat. Aku hanya ada tunggul dengan akaryang hampir mati…” kata pohon apel itu dengan nadapilu.”
Aku tidak mahu apelmu kerana aku sudah tiada bergigiuntuk memakannya, aku tidak mahu dahanmu kerana akusudah tua untuk memotongnya, aku tidak mahu batangpohonmu kerana aku berupaya untuk belayar lagi, akumerasa lelah dan ingin istirahat,” jawab lelaki tuaitu.”

Jika begitu, istirahatlah di perduku,” kata pohonapel itu.Lalu lelaki tua itu duduk beristirahat di perdu pohonapel itu dan beristirahat. Mereka berdua menangiskegembiraan.
Tersebut. Sebenarnya, pohon apel yang dimaksudkan didalam cerita itu adalah kedua-dua ibu bapa kita. Bilakita masih muda, kita suka bermain dengan mereka.Ketika kita meningkat remaja, kita perlukan bantuanmereka untuk meneruskan hidup. Kita tinggalkan mereka,dan hanya kembali meminta pertolongan apabila kita didalam kesusahan. Namun begitu, mereka tetap menolongkita dan melakukan apa saja asalkan kita bahagia dangembira dalam hidup.Anda mungkin terfikir bahwa anak lelaki itu bersikapkejam terhadap pohon apel itu, tetapi fikirkanlah, ituhakikatnya bagaimana kebanyakan anak-anak masa kinimelayan ibu bapa mereka. Hargailah jasa ibu bapakepada kita. Jangan hanya kita menghargai mereka semasa menyambut hari ibu dan hari bapak setiap tahun.

Sumber Terkait :

http://id-id.facebook.com/notes/komunikasi-islam/kisah-pohon-apel-jasa-ortu-kita/119720084717041

Sahabat Yang Terlupakan

Reblogged from Moeslem26's Blog:

Click to visit the original post

sahabat….
dulu…..
ku susuri setiap keluhku denganmu
setiap tawa,canda dan airmata
ku labuhkan di pelukmu
kurindukan hadirmu kembali
di sini……
di antara asa dan harapan
antara mimpi dan kenyataan
dalam perihnya hidup
yang kini ku jalani….
ku ingin kau ada di sini untukku
tapi……
angan tinggallah angan
kau telah pergi ke dunia yang tak sama denganku
sampaikan salam kami tuk para bidadari dan para penghuni surga disana sobat...

Read more… 15 more words

ini yang aku alami :(

Jakarta Banjir,... numpak neng Yateee jajal Adventure Riding ...!!!

Reblogged from Rudi Triatmono Personal Blogs:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Well,... hari ini seperti biasa... pagi-pagi nyamber neng Yateee... kenapa nggak pake Ki Tumenggung aka Kawaks ER-6n... ??? Soalnya perlu bagasi buat naro laptopz... dan langsung samber kunci neng Yateee ... Go ready to ride ...!!! Keluar rumaaah,... waduuugh langsung hujan deras... dont panic ... nggak usah stress... anggap saza wet race... biar mindset rasanya happy ...!!! Neng Yateee dilengkapi dengan ban Michelin...

Read more… 158 more words

khatam sama lokasi banjir nih

i’m serenaders Indonesia

Sedikit tentang Secondhand Serenade

Picture

Dari kecil John Vesely suka bermain musik. First musical project John Vesely adalah “SKANKIN WEDGIES”. Skankin Wedgies adalah sebuah band ska, yang terdiri dari Kyle Camarillo, Collin Camarillo, dan John Vesely. Saat itu, usia John Vesely adalah 12 tahun. Dari band inilah, John mengenal bass. Karena Kyle memintanya untuk menjadi bass player. Mereka membuat beberapa lagu yang diciptakan oleh Kyle dan John. Dan dibantu pula oleh orang tua Kyle, Collin, dan John. Mereka berlatih di garasi. Prinsip mereka, bermain musik tidak untuk mencari uang, namun untuk menghibur orang-orang di luar sana.

Tak lama setelah itu, mereka memutuskan untuk sendiri. John akhirnya tergabung dengan beberapa band lokal. Ada sebuah band (kita masih mencari namanya), dan John bergabung di band itu. Di band itulah, John untuk pertama kalinya menyanyi untuk sebuah band. Di band dimana John mulai jadi vokalis, sang vokalis utama sendiri malah didepak personil band mereka, & John mengisi bagian vokalis.

Sounds Like Life, ini satu band yang diseriusin oleh John Vesely. Di Sounds Like Life ini, John Vesely dengan Ronnie Day membuat beberapa lagu, yaitu Heroes Die, Slow Down, dan salah satunya “Broken” yang kemudian akhirnya dimasukkan ke dalam album Awake. Kemudian, mereka memutuskan untuk bubar dan memulai musik di jalan mereka sendiri. Ronnie Day memilih dengan jalur musiknya sendiri dengan solo. Sedangkan John Vesely sendiri memulai acoustic projectnya sendiri.

John memulai acoustic side projectnya pada tahun 2005. Acoustic side project sendiri muncul karena Candice, yang waktu itu masih menjadi istri John ingin disenandungkan sebuah lagu oleh John. Kemudian John beralih dari gitar bass ke gitar akustik dan memainkan lagu untuk Candice. Dari awal mula tersebut, kemudian John membuat acoustic side project ini.

Dan dia membuat myspace dan diuploadlah lagu-lagu tersebut, antar lain Vulnerable dan Maybe. Banyak dari pengguna MySpace mendengarkan lagu John di halaman MySpacenya. Yang kemudian akhirnya dia memiliki 3000 teman di myspacenya. Semua berawal dari Myspace. Lagu-lagu John dipromosikan lewat Myspace dan orang-orang mengorder lagu-lagu tsb lewat paypal account. Dan akhirnya Chris Maltese menemukan John di MySpace dan tertarik dengan musik John. Akhirnya Chris dan John bertemu, dan mereka membicarakan tentang project akustiknya John. Dan Chris berencana untuk jadi manager John Vesely.

John memutuskan untuk menggunakan nama Secondhand Serenade. Yang bisa diartikan, Secondhand adalah penikmat musik yang kedua setelah Candice. Dan Serenade sendiri adalah senandung/menyenandungkan lagu. Dua kata ini sangat simple, namun mempunyai arti yang bagus untuk John sendiri. Saat ditanya “Why Secondhand Serenade” Why not just John”, dia berkata “Its not about me, but its all about music”. Dan akhirnya John Vesely memproduce album Awake dengan budgetnya sendiri dan disupport oleh orang tuanya.
Tidak hanya album, John juga produce merchandise dengan budgetnya sendiri. Dan kemudian, John mulai show di beberapa kota dibantu dengan Chris Maltese. Chris Maltese yang menjadi manager Secondhand Serenade menghubungi Daniel Glass yang sedang membangun perusahaan rekaman agar lebih besar. Chris Maltese mengirim email kepada Daniel Glass. Email itu adalah online love story email yang belum pernah didengar & dibuat. Dan Chris juga mengirim lagu Vulnerable dan Maybe untuk diperdengarkan ke Daniel Glass & mengundang Daniel utk datang ke show Secondhand Serenade.
Pada saat show, Chris membantu John untuk menjual CD dan Merchandise kepada fans-fans Secondhand Serenade. Daniel melihat show John dan dia excited dengan musik John dan interaksi John dengan penonton/fans. Chris memberikan Daniel CD dan merchandise scra free dan Daniel berkata “No, no, take my money.” Dia sangat menghargai kerja keras John. Setelah Chris mengenalkan John kepada Daniel & mereka chit-chat sebentar. Daniel Glass berkata “Kita harus kerja sama”. Daniel pulang dengan senyum puas. Sebulan kemudian, Daniel mengontak John dan dia berkata akan datang ke rumah John.

John menjemput Daniel di bandara. Selama menunggu pesawat Daniel yang akan landing, dia membuat lagu untuk Daniel Glass. Di rumah John, Daniel merasa sangat nyaman. Rumah John penuh cinta dgn kelucuan anak-anak John dengan diapersnya. “It was a great day we ever had”, kata Daniel Glass saat chillin di rumah John dan membicarakan tentang kontrak mereka. Daniel Glass bilang “we should married our project John, you need me and i need you”. Dan Daniel Glass mengontrak John Vesely untuk menjadi artis Glassnote Records.

John rekaman dan menghasilkan 8 great songs, not good songs, but GREAT SONGS untuk album A Twist In My Story. Recording pertama adalah lagu “Broken”. John sangat menyukai lagu ini. “Its really a good song. I really like it” – John Vesely. Lagu ini selalu ada di setlist Secondhand Serenade. Dan akhirnya Awake diproduksi kembali dengan label Glassnote Records.

http://shsindonesia.weebly.com/history.html

International student

What type of student do you have to teach?

Most lecturers try to help students develop their understanding. But understanding a foreign language is not the same as understanding why someone is upset or understanding electromagnetism or understanding history. It is not to be expected therefore that the same teaching methods will be appropriate to these different kinds of understanding.

Most forms of understanding are expressed by concepts which differ from everyday ones. For example, we all know that suitcases get heavier the longer you carry them, but in science this is described in terms of constant weight plus increasing fatigue. The concept “weight” is introduced and laid alongside the commonsense concept of “heaviness’. Similarly we all know that time passes quickly when we are absorbed and slowly when we are bored, but science tells us that this is an illusion; time really ticks away at a steady rate. Note that conceptual change should not be the aim, as is sometimes suggested, since people still also need their common sense. The aim is to add new sets of concepts and to explain when to use which set.

But “understanding” is not the only kind of learning which students need to master. Instruction, demonstration and error-correction are the key teaching activities – which are quite different from those needed to reach understanding – while practice is the main learning activity.

Students also have to memorise information and be able to recall it when required, as well as acquire several other kinds of learning (such as know-how and attitudes and values) each of which calls for different teaching methods. So learning-centred teaching includes a conscious matching of teaching methods to the intended kind of learning.

While good teaching involves, among other things, helping students to achieve their chosen learning goals, the picture is further complicated by the different learning styles adopted by different groups of students.

Many ways of categorisation and modelling students as learners have been suggested, of which the following are as useful as any, particularly in connection with understanding. (Differences between learners’ natural learning styles are not so significant when skills are being taught, since the appropriate style is determined more by the activity involved than by students’ natural capabilities.)

Some students are “holists”: which means they like to take an overview of a subject first and then fill in the details and concepts in their own way.

Others are “serialists” who like to follow a logical progression of a subject, beginning at the beginning. Educational researcher Gordon Pask structured some teaching materials in both a holist and a serialist manner, and then tested previously-sorted cohorts of students using them. He found that the best performance of those who were mismatched (i.e. holist students with serialist material, and vice versa) was worse than the worst performance of those who were matched to the learning materials.

This seems to imply, for example, that educational textbooks – which are naturally serialist in character – should include signposts, summaries, alternative explanations of difficult concepts, explanatory figure captions, a glossary of terms, a good index, etc, to help holist students find their own way through them. Similarly projects, which are naturally holist in character, since they are usually specified in terms of a final goal, can cause problems for serialists, who may therefore need step-by-step guidance.

Another group of students are “visualisers” whose learning is helped by the inclusion of diagrams, pictures, flow-charts, films, etc. Others are “verbalisers” and prefer to listen, read, discuss, argue, attend tutorials and write during their conceptual development. And some are “doers” and find that overt practical activity is best. The saying that “to hear is to forget, to see is to remember, but to do is to understand” is only true for “doers”. With a typical mix of students, attempts should be made to cater for each preferred style.

It is well known nowadays that for the development of “understanding” and for the memorisation of information it is important that students adopt a “deep approach” to their learning, rather than a “surface approach’. The deep approach refers to an intention to develop their understanding and to challenge ideas, while the “surface approach” is the intention to memorise information and to follow instructions. Although students are naturally inclined towards one approach rather than the other – often with a new subject the inclination is towards the surface approach – this can vary from subject to subject and can usually be changed by the teaching they receive. Overloading, for example, will encourage the surface approach; stimulating interest may encourage the deep approach. Given the deep approach, even good lectures can make a considerable contribution to students’ “understanding”.

Recently the need to encourage the deep approach in students has been allowed to dominate the choice of teaching method, sometimes at the expense of effective teaching. Constructivism in science teaching, for example, in which students are encouraged to devise their own explanations of phenomena, certainly tends to encourage the deep approach, but it can also leave students with misconceptions. Similarly, though problem-based learning is usually popular with students, it teaches “know-how” rather than “understanding”: unless explicit conceptual guidance is also given.

The fact that students have different preferred learning styles also has important implications for course evaluation through feedback. It often seems to be assumed that students are a homogeneous bunch and that therefore a majority opinion condemning a certain aspect of a course justifies changing it for the future. But this can well be a mistake. If a course is well matched, say, to “holist verbalisers” it is unlikely to be found very helpful to “serialist visualisers”. In other words, feedback is likely to reveal as much about the students as about the course or lecturer, and can be quite misleading unless it is properly analysed in terms of the preferred learning styles of the particular cohort of students.

Indeed, student feedback about the teaching of “understanding” can, in any case, be quite misleading, since students cannot be expected to judge what has been helpful to them until much of the necessary conceptual development has occurred. Only after “the penny has dropped” is such feedback likely to be reliable. Similarly, favourable feedback about the necessary but tedious practising of important “skills” cannot normally be expected.

These considerations are all aspects of learning-centred teaching, with which all lecturers should, in due course, become familiar. Innovation in education without taking these matters into consideration is at best cavalier, at worst irresponsible, for it is the students who suffer from teachers’ ill-founded experiments.

John Sparkes, Times Higher Education Supplement. February 6th, 1998.

 

Read the following article (The Personal Qualities of A Teacher). Then answer these questions about the article.

  1. What is the topic sentence/the main idea of each paragraph? Remember: the topic sentence or the main idea is not always the first sentence.
  2. What is the concluding sentence?
  3. What are the supporting details for the article.  (make the mind mapping)
  4. Write a summary of the article.

 

Ö   THE ANSWER

A.     

  1. the same teaching methods will be appropriate to these different kinds of understanding The aim is to add new sets of concepts and to explain when to use which set.
  2. So learning-centred teaching includes a conscious matching of teaching methods to the intended kind of learning.
  3. While good teaching involves, among other things, helping students to achieve their chosen learning goals,
  4. Many ways of categorisation and modelling students as learners have been suggested, of which the following are as useful as any, particularly in connection with understanding.
  5. the best performance of those who were mismatched (i.e. holist students with serialist material, and vice versa) was worse than the worst performance of those who were matched to the learning materials.
  6. Similarly projects, which are naturally holist in character, since they are usually specified in terms of a final goal, can cause problems for serialists, who may therefore need step-by-step guidance.
  7. And some are “doers” and find that overt practical activity is best. The saying that “to hear is to forget, to see is to remember, but to do is to understand” is only true for “doers”.
  8. It is well known nowadays that for the development of “understanding” and for the memorisation of information it is important that students adopt a “deep approach” to their learning, rather than a “surface approach’.
  9. Similarly, though problem-based learning is usually popular with students, it teaches “know-how” rather than “understanding”: unless explicit conceptual guidance is also given.
  10. It often seems to be assumed that students are a homogeneous bunch and that therefore a majority opinion condemning a certain aspect of a course justifies changing it for the future.
  11. Similarly, favourable feedback about the necessary but tedious practising of important “skills” cannot normally be expected.
  12. Innovation in education without taking these matters into consideration is at best cavalier, at worst irresponsible, for it is the students who suffer from teachers’ ill-founded experiments.

 

  1. learning-centred teaching includes a conscious matching of teaching methods to the intended kind of learning. While good teaching involves, among other things, helping students to achieve their chosen learning goals, the picture is further complicated by the different learning styles adopted by different groups of students.

These considerations are all aspects of learning-centred teaching, with which all lecturers should, in due course, become familiar. Innovation in education without taking these matters into consideration is at best cavalier, at worst irresponsible, for it is the students who suffer from teachers’ ill-founded experiments.

  1. C.    understanding a foreign language is not the same as understanding why someone is upset or understanding electromagnetism or understanding history.
  2. Holist

1.1  which means they like to take an overview of a subject first and then fill in the details and concepts in their own way

1.2  verbalisers

1.3  prefer to listen, read, discuss, argue, attend tutorials and write during their conceptual development

  1. Serialist

2.1  who like to follow a logical progression of a subject, beginning at the beginning

2.2  visualisers

2.3  whose learning is helped by the inclusion of diagrams, pictures, flow-charts, films

  1. pendekatan yang mendalam

5.1 to their learning, and to an intention to develop their understanding and to challenge ideas

  1. pendekatan permukaan

4.1  the intention to memorise information and to follow instructions.

  1. In learning a foreign language is different from understanding the history. Most forms of the understanding expressed by the concept that varies from day to day. In understanding, students not only mastered the kind of apprenticeship, however, instruction, demonstrations, and error correction is also important because it is a key activity. And practice is the main activity in the process of teaching and learning. Students gain some types of learning methods, each of which varies according to your pengistilahannya method for teaching and learning. Teaching aims to assist students in achieving the learning objectives of their choosing. The difference between natural learners learning style is not so significant when skills are taught, since it matches the style of more is determined by the activity of natural ability involved students. Some categorization, among others, students first, a Holist means taking the core conception and in their own way. both serialist where students follow a logical progression of the subject from the beginning. third, visualisers which students learn with pictures, movies and others. Furthermore, verbalisers students learn by listening, reading, debating and others. So that students choose appropriate learning style and preferred. There are two approaches to the construction of understanding, namely:
    1. In-depth Approach, which refers to the intention to develop
    2. Approach the surface, which refers to the intention to memorize information and rotate according to the instructions.

However, students naturally tend towards the surface approach to be able to make a    considerable contribution in learning to understand.

 

” Obat Lelah Manusia Gerobak “

dari kiri , gofar,ali, tok,

dari kiri , gofar,ali, tok,

silai, dedi, ali

silai, dedi, ali

 

 

Pada Workshop Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi-Kalbis Institute bernama EXCODIA 2012 lalu, saya mendapat pengetahuan dan wawasan baru dibidang jurnalistik dan advertising. di Dampingi oleh narasumber-narasumber berpengalaman dibidangnya saya dibekali dasar-dasar memulai sesuatu yang saya minati. Berikut hasil dari workshop yang saya dapat pahami sebagai berikut :

  • Meliput Berita
    : wartawan memburu, mereka ke lapangan dan melibatkan pengumpulan fakta serta pengecekan data secara cermat. Kadang wartawan menyaksikan suatu berita sendiri, tapi umumnya mengetahui secara rinci dari pihak lain (saksi/pakar)
  • Informasi yang Dikumpulkan : Informasi harus  memenuhi 5W + 1H
  • Memulai Wawancara :
    • Observasi
    • Dalih-dalih Sumber berita (membujuk)
    • Melakukan wawancara dengan daftar pernyataan sedetail mungkin.

Nilai suatu foto berita dapat dilihat dari :

  • Aktualitas
  • Hubungan yang dekat
  • Luarbiasa
  • Prominansi
  • Penting
  • Human interest
  • Universal

Terdapat beberapa Kategori Fotojurnalistik berdasarkan standar World Press Photo tetapi, yang akan saya bahas dalam wawancara berjudul “ Obat Lelah Manusia Gerobak “ adalah foto keseharian (daily life) berikut hasil wawancara saya :

Saya tinggal dilingkungan yang sangat ramai, dimana terdapat juga manusia gerobak (pemulung). Dua hari lalu(30/11) saya melintasi sebuah rumah warga setempat, melihat ada kerumunan ramai saya berniat menghampiri. Disana saya bertemu bang Dedi, Silai, Ali, Tok, dan Gofar. Menariknya mereka sedang bermain Gaple dan bagi siapapun yang kalah taruhannya bukan lagi uang, mereka menggunakan Bandulan yakni Dua botol aqua ukuran 1,5 liter untuk digantungkan dileher. Pada saat itu yang kalah adalah bang Ali (gambar 1: dari kiri kedua)

Ada tatacara dalam bermain gaple, yakni :

  1. Penentuan pasangan gaple dengan cara di kocok
  2. system permainan3 kali games (3 babak / 2-1)
  3.  Balak 0 (kosong) & balak 6 (enam) tidak boleh diturunkan diawal permainan, jika tidak mempunyai balak permainan dapat diwakilkan oleh teman main
  4. Pemain yang habis terlebih dahulu di nyatakan memimpin permainan (menurunkan kartu terlebih dahulu)
  5. Adu gaple melawan sebelah kiri jika kalah maka dihitung 2 kali lipat dan jika menang di semua terkecuali yang menggaple menang dan jika adu gaple draw (seri) maka permainan di ulang
  6.  Balak 0 (kosong) terjepit di denda senilai 25, balak 6 (enam) senilai 50 dan jika games (finish)memakai balak 0 (kosong) senilai 50 balak 6 (enam) 100
  7. Salah buang didenda senilai 20 dengan mengurangi nilai yang ada jika masih kosong maka -20
  8. Point masuk pertama minimal nilai 25 baru di catat
  9. Jika salah satu pemain mempunyai 5 balak maka permainan di ulang, jika mempunyai 6 balak di nyataka menang
  10. Di awal permainan di bawahnya lewal demikian juga selanjutnya juga lewat maka permainan di ulang.

Mereka melakukan ini rutin setiap harinya pada waktu sore hari, saat mereka istirahat. Sambil bercanda (ngecengin) mereka jadikan lawakan sederhana. Kekeluargaan terjalin erat, mereka semua bersahabat akrab, bahkan seperti saudara. Hal terbaik sampai terburuk sekalipun pernah dialami yakni tidur di jalanan karna tidak ada kamar dilapak tempat menjual barang pulungannya.

Lima sekawan ini bercerita kalau kegiatan ini membuat mereka senang, menghilangkan rasa lelah karena bekerja seharian, sekaligus quality time. Tak jarang mereka terlibat konflik karena salah ucap, tapi itu hanya sementara dan balik kesemula.

 

Sekian tugas saya dalam wawancara jurnalistik kehidupan sehari-hari, semoga bermanfaat.

Terima kasih

 

Halo dunia!

Reblogged from acdisy's Life:

Hi world , kami terdiri dari beberapa anak muda yang bertemu tanpa sengaja, kemudian membentuk radar.

blog ini adalah sepenggal dari rangkaian tugas kuliah kami. blog ini termasuk di mata kuliah TI yang didampingi dosen bapak Alexander Waworuntu . semoga nilai yang didapatkan sesuai dengan hasilnya ini . (amin)oke akhir kata attar firdaus, cita suci aulia a, della sesilia, isty nurjayanti : adelia kusfianti(bukan anggota kelompok), syarifah adilla, dan  saya yanti nuraini.

Read more… 15 more words

this is my project :)